← Blog

How to track outstanding fees across open matters without letting any slip through

Outstanding fees are the most common blind spot in a busy legal or conveyancing practice. The work is done, the client is satisfied, the matter is off the fee earner's desk — and the billing is left hanging. Multiply that across several matters a month, and the practice ends up carrying a quiet backlog of fees it is owed but has not yet collected.

The problem is rarely a reluctance to chase. It is the absence of a system that makes what is outstanding visible without anyone having to go looking for it.

Why fees accumulate without anyone noticing

Three patterns appear consistently in practices that struggle with this:

Matter closure and financial closure are not the same event. When a matter completes — the deed is executed, the report on title is delivered, the keys change hands — the file closes operationally. If the final invoice has not been raised or a balance remains outstanding, that loose thread stays attached to a file that everyone has mentally moved on from.

Billing and matter management live in different places. Time recording and invoicing may sit in the accounts system, while the matter file lives in the practice management system, a shared drive, or on paper. No one has both views at once, so the financial status of a matter is invisible during the normal course of working on it.

The follow-up lives in someone's head. "I still need to send Mrs Thornton the final invoice — I'll do it Monday." Across ten active matters, that mental queue becomes unreliable. Something always moves to the front; other things drift.

What any workable system needs

The tools available to a practice for managing outstanding fees vary widely — from a column in a spreadsheet to a dedicated field in a practice management system. What matters less than the tool is whether the system meets three conditions:

1. The billing status has to be attached to the matter. If checking whether a matter has been fully invoiced and paid requires opening a separate programme, searching an inbox, or asking the accounts team, the system will not be used consistently. Status needs to be visible where the matter already lives.

2. Pending items have to surface without anyone searching for them. The difference between a manual list and a system is that the system generates the view of what is outstanding automatically. If building that list requires reviewing matters one by one, the system has a gap.

3. Updating the status has to be frictionless. If marking a payment as received involves multiple steps or crossing between systems, it will not happen reliably. The effort of recording a receipt has to be comparable to the effort of recording that a letter went out.

The minimum statuses worth tracking

For most practices, four status categories are enough to maintain clear visibility:

  • Invoice not yet raised: the matter has closed operationally but no invoice has been issued.
  • Invoice sent, awaiting payment: the invoice is with the client; no payment has been received.
  • Part paid: a retainer or instalment has been received; a balance remains outstanding.
  • Fully paid: the matter can be closed on the financial side.

With those four categories consistently maintained, a fifteen-minute review on any given afternoon tells the practice what is outstanding, what has been waiting longest, and what can be formally closed.

When to update the status

The most common failure mode is intending to update billing records when there is time — which in practice means at month end, when it is hard to reconstruct what happened on individual matters. Three specific trigger points make the record far more reliable:

  • At matter closure: before a file is put away, confirm whether an invoice has been raised. If it has not, log it as pending immediately — not as a task for later.
  • When the invoice goes out: record the date. The date is what makes it possible to see, at a glance, how long something has been outstanding.
  • When payment arrives: record the amount and date, and close the financial record on the matter.

Three moments, each with a clear action, distributed through the matter lifecycle rather than batched at the end.

How often to review what is outstanding

For most practices, a weekly sweep — fifteen to twenty minutes reviewing invoices that have been outstanding beyond a set threshold — is enough to keep the backlog under control. The review criterion should be time, not value. A £250 disbursement that has been unpaid for six weeks warrants the same attention as a larger invoice. The habit of chasing high-value items and letting smaller ones drift is exactly how some fees are never recovered.

The annual review

Once a year, it is worth conducting a more thorough review of all open financial records. The purpose is not just to chase what is collectible — it is also to make a deliberate decision about matters where collection is now unlikely. Keeping matters open in the system with outstanding balances that will not be recovered distorts the practice's view of its actual financial position.

Questions worth asking in that annual pass:

  • Which matters have had an unpaid balance for more than six months?
  • Was there any active follow-up during that period?
  • Is continued recovery effort worthwhile, or does the balance need to be written off?

It is not a comfortable conversation, but it is the one that gives the practice an accurate picture of where it actually stands.


At VerifyAct we build tools to help practices stay organised and error-free. Get in touch if that sounds useful.